Good morning! The sun’s up, the coffee’s brewing, and it’s time to dive into another domain roasting session. Today, we’re dissecting a batch of domains listed for sale on DNForum.com, posted on February 14, 2025, and still lingering unsold as of today.
The seller’s thread screams “Selling Premium Domains! Low Prices!” and tosses out some lofty claims: these domains have history, high authority, memorability, SEO potential, past traffic, and resale value.
Bold words, my friend, but let’s see if the goods match the hype.
If you want to view the thread, please click here.
We will be roasting these domains with a 5-trash-can system: 1 trash can is the least trashy (actually decent), and 5 trash cans is the dumpster fire of domain names.
For the truly abysmal ones, I’ll roast hard, no mercy. But if I spot a diamond in the rough, I’ll give the seller some honest praise. Let’s get started with the unsold domains, then peek at the three that actually sold.
The Unsold Domains: Still Waiting for a Sucker
1. AiGeminis.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“AiGeminis” mashes “AI” and “Geminis” into a confusing stew. Is this about artificial intelligence or horoscopes? The lack of clarity tanks its branding potential. At $299, it’s not a total disaster, but it’s too clunky to be premium. Pass.
2. AnimeThere.com ($299) – 1 Trash Can
Hold the phone—AnimeThere.com is a gem in this pile. It’s clear, niche-specific, and perfect for an anime streaming site or fan hub. The name is memorable, easy to spell, and taps into a passionate community. At $299, this is a steal. Seller, you’ve got a winner here—don’t let it go cheap!
3. BestCoinList.com ($299) – 2 Trash Cans
“BestCoinList” is a solid contender for a crypto site. It’s clear and functional, though a bit generic—there’s no “wow” factor. Still, for $299, it’s one of the least trashy here. Decent pick for SEO in the crypto niche. Kudos, seller, this one’s not half bad.
4. BetOfPoker.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“BetOfPoker” feels like a grammatical stumble. Poker betting? Betting on poker? It’s awkward and forgettable. “PokerBet.com” would’ve been sharper. At $299, it’s mid-tier trash—not the worst, but not premium.
5. BettingWon.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“BettingWon” trips over itself. Did betting win, or did someone win at betting? The ambiguity kills its branding vibe. It’s not a complete trainwreck, but $299 feels steep for this confusion.
6. BotsCoupon.com ($199) – 4 Trash Cans
“BotsCoupon”? What even is this—coupons for robots or bots hunting deals? It’s a nonsensical mashup that’s neither memorable nor marketable. At $199, it’s still overpriced garbage. Toss it.
7. CameraTechDaily.com ($299) – 2 Trash Cans
“CameraTechDaily” is long but clear—a tech or photography news site could rock this. It’s straightforward and has SEO potential. Not flashy, but at $299, it’s a solid buy. Nice one, seller!
8. CarLawn.com ($299) – 4 Trash Cans
“CarLawn” sounds like a parking lot for Matchbox toys. Cars on a lawn? Lawn care for car owners? It’s a head-scratcher with zero appeal. $299? You’re kidding, right?
9. CasinoDisc.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“CasinoDisc” hints at discounts or discussions but doesn’t commit. It’s vague and meh. Could work for a niche casino site, but it’s not screaming “premium” at $299.
10. CelebMastery.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“CelebMastery” suggests celebrity expertise, but it’s clunky. Shorten it to “CelebPro” and you’d have something. It’s not awful, just uninspired for $299.
11. CelebWist.com ($299) – 4 Trash Cans
“CelebWist”? Is “wist” a typo for “twist” or “list”? It’s a mystery wrapped in a yawn. Unmemorable and unbrandable—$299 is a joke for this trash.
12. CoffeeBaze.com ($149) – 3 Trash Cans
“CoffeeBaze” tries to funky up “coffee base,” but it lands flat. It’s not terrible, just forgettable. At $149, it’s cheap enough to forgive the mediocrity.
13. cryptospacey.com ($299) – 4 Trash Cans
“Cryptospacey” is a tongue-twister that fuses crypto and… space? It’s a confusing mess with no clear purpose. $299 for this? Take it to the landfill.
14. CycleGuider.com ($199) – 2 Trash Cans
“CycleGuider” is clean and clear—perfect for a cycling blog or shop. It’s not dazzling, but it works. At $199, this is a steal. Well played, seller!
15. FootballTakes.com ($199) – 2 Trash Cans
“FootballTakes” is simple and effective for sports hot takes. Generic, sure, but it’s got SEO legs. $199 is a fair price—another win for the seller.
16. GadgetPixels.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“GadgetPixels” is a vague mashup. Gadgets with pixels? Tech photography? It’s not clear enough to justify $299. Middle-of-the-road trash.
17. GadgetsFund.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“GadgetsFund” could mean gadget crowdfunding, but it’s too ambiguous. It’s not a disaster, just bland for $299.
18. GamingHarsh.com ($299) – 4 Trash Cans
“GamingHarsh”? Harsh gaming reviews? Tough games? It’s an odd, off-putting combo. $299 for this clunker is laughable.
19. GrillSuggest.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“GrillSuggest” is functional but dull. Grilling tips? BBQ ideas? It’s not catchy enough for $299. Meh.
20. LawnsZone.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“LawnsZone” is generic but usable for lawn care. It’s not memorable, though, and $299 feels like a stretch.
21. NetOnlineCasino.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“NetOnlineCasino” is redundant—“net” and “online” say the same thing. It’s clunky and forgettable for $299.
22. NftMediaBox.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“NftMediaBox” rides the NFT wave but feels bulky. It’s not awful, just not $299 premium.
23. PetsCities.com ($299) – 4 Trash Cans
“PetsCities” is a grammatical trainwreck. Pets in cities? City pets? It’s nonsense—$299 is delusional.
24. petspik.com ($299) – 4 Trash Cans
“Petspik”? What’s “spik”? A typo? A spike for pets? It’s gibberish and $299 worth of trash.
25. PreviewCasinos.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“PreviewCasinos” is okay for casino reviews but lacks punch. It’s forgettable at $299.
26. PrinterWiki.com ($299) – 2 Trash Cans
“PrinterWiki” is niche and clear—great for a printer info hub. $299 is reasonable. Good job, seller!
27. PublicGadget.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“PublicGadget” is vague. Public how? It’s not terrible, just uninspired for $299.
28. SmutManga.com ($299) – 4 Trash Cans
“SmutManga” is hyper-niche and risky. It’s got a tiny audience, but it’s not brandable or memorable. $299? Nope.
29. SoftGeneral.com ($299) – 4 Trash Cans
“SoftGeneral” is a baffling combo. Soft what? General what? It’s trash—$299 is absurd.
30. SpinOfWin.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“SpinOfWin” hints at a game but feels off. “SpinToWin” would’ve been better. It’s meh for $299.
31. SpotaMovie.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“SpotaMovie” is quirky but unclear. Spotting movies? It’s not bad, just not $299 good.
32. StarTabloids.com ($299) – 4 Trash Cans
“StarTabloids”? Tabloids that start something? It’s a typo waiting to happen—$299 trash.
33. Stobex.com ($499) – 3 Trash Cans
“Stobex” is a made-up word with potential, but $499 is steep for zero recognition. Risky.
34. StunRing.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“StunRing” could be stun guns or jewelry—too vague. It’s not awful, just not $299 premium.
35. TechConflict.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“TechConflict” sounds negative. Tech disputes? It’s not appealing for $299.
36. TechExceed.com ($299) – 2 Trash Cans
“TechExceed” is sharp and techy—great for a forward-thinking site. $299 is fair. Nice one!
37. TechsUpgrade.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“TechsUpgrade” is clunky. “TechUpgrade” would’ve been smoother. It’s okay, not $299 great.
38. TechyArea.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“TechyArea” is generic and forgettable. Tech blog potential, but $299 is too much.
39. ThenBurger.com ($299) – 4 Trash Cans
“ThenBurger”? Then what? It’s nonsense—$299 for this is a burger-sized scam.
40. TimesRead.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“TimesRead” could be reading times, but it’s dull. Not worth $299.
41. ToolBetting.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“ToolBetting” is confusing. Betting on tools? Tools for betting? It’s murky for $299.
42. WindowsMiner.com ($299) – 2 Trash Cans
“WindowsMiner” nails a crypto niche—mining on Windows. Clear and useful. $299 is a steal. Well done!
43. WinHereCasino.com ($299) – 3 Trash Cans
“WinHereCasino” is generic and uninspired. It’s not terrible, just not $299 premium.
The Sold Domains: What Worked?
- ComputerPacer.com – Clear, memorable, and tech-focused. Likely sold because it’s straightforward and brandable.
- gadgetsname.com – A bit clunky, but it’s obvious—gadget reviews or naming. Simple enough to sell.
- PlaySwiz.com – Made-up but catchy. The “Swiz” could hint at Switzerland or swizzle—intriguing enough to snag a buyer.
These sold names outshine most of the unsold list. They’re clearer, punchier, and more marketable, which explains why they’re off the market.
Premium? Low Prices? A Mixed Bag
The seller touts their domains as premium—boasting history, authority, memorability, SEO potential, traffic, and resale value—all at “low prices” like $299. At first glance, that sounds like a stretch, but let’s give credit where it’s due: AnimeThere.com is a standout. It’s memorable, niche-specific (perfect for anime fans), and at $299, it’s a steal that could easily justify a higher price tag. Other names like CameraTechDaily.com and WindowsMiner.com also hold their own, offering clear niche appeal and reasonable value.
That said, the lineup isn’t all sunshine and roses. For every gem, there’s a dud—or three. Domains like PetsCities.com (what even is that?), ThenBurger.com (a typo waiting to happen), and others feel confusing, clunky, or just plain forgettable. At $299 each, they’re overpriced for what they deliver. The sold domains—ComputerPacer.com, gadgetsname.com, and PlaySwiz.com—prove buyers gravitate toward clarity and relevance, leaving the weaker names behind.
So, are these “premium” domains at “low prices”? It’s not a total bust like the original title suggested, but it’s not a slam dunk either. “A Mixed Bag” fits better—it acknowledges the highs (like AnimeThere.com) while calling out the lows. If you’re browsing this list, grab the strong picks like AnimeThere.com or CycleGuider.com—they’re worth it. The rest? Leave them to collect digital cobwebs. Seller, you’ve got some winners here, but ease up on overselling the flops!